Elkton Die Casting Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

614 F.2d 120, 104 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2546, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21011
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 29, 1980·No. 77-1616·Published

Opinion

The issue is whether substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that the Company violated Section 8(a)l and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 151, et seq., by discharging William Adrian Stokes (“Stokes”) because of his union activities. The Court must consider all evidence in the record that does not support the Board’s decision as well as any supporting evidence. Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

The Court has reviewed the evidence of record and finds that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record.

The Order of the Board is hereby enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elkton Die Casting Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 614 F.2d 120, 104 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2546, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21011 (6th Cir. 1980).

614 F.2d 120 (Elkton Die Casting Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related