Elkins v. Ferencz

New York Court of Appeals

Elkins v. Ferencz

715 N.E.2d 504, 93 N.Y.2d 938, 693 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2855

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 3, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 715 N.E.2d 504 (Elkins v. Ferencz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elkins v. Ferencz, 715 N.E.2d 504, 93 N.Y.2d 938, 693 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2855 (N.Y. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration and resolution of all other issues within its plenary intermediate appellate authority. The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, is legally sufficient to support the jury’s verdict.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration and resolution of all other issues within its plenary intermediate appellate authority. The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, is legally sufficient to support the jury’s verdict.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 N.E.2d 504, 93 N.Y.2d 938, 693 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elkins-v-ferencz-ny-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack