Elkins v. Ferencz

715 N.E.2d 504, 93 N.Y.2d 938, 693 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2855
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 3, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration and resolution of all other issues within its plenary intermediate appellate authority. The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, is legally sufficient to support the jury’s verdict.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elkins v. Ferencz, 715 N.E.2d 504, 93 N.Y.2d 938, 693 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2855 (N.Y. 1999).

715 N.E.2d 504 (Elkins v. Ferencz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elkins v. Ferencz
263 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)