Elkins v. Claunch

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Elkins v. Claunch

51 So. 2d 826

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 5, 1951

DocketNo. 7641

StatusPublished

This text of 51 So. 2d 826 (Elkins v. Claunch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elkins v. Claunch, 51 So. 2d 826 (La. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

KENNON, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters, La.App., 51 So.2d 819, the judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mrs. Inez Elkins, and against defendants, R. E. Claunch and Highway Insurance Underwriters, is amended to read $3,-167.06, and the judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mrs. Inez Elkins, and against defendant, R. E. Claunch, is amended to read $3,-482.94.

The judgment in favor of plaintiff, Virgil Elkins, and against defendants, R. E. Claunch and Highway Insurance Under[827]*827writers, is amended to read $247.18, and the judgment in favor of plaintiff, Virgil El-kins, and against defendant, R. E. Claunch, is amended to read $272.57.

In all other respects the judgments in favor of these plaintiffs are to remain as written. As amended, the entire judgment is affirmed, with costs of both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KENNON, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters, La.App., 51 So.2d 819, the judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mrs. Inez Elkins, and against defendants, R. E. Claunch and Highway Insurance Underwriters, is amended to read $3,-167.06, and the judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mrs. Inez Elkins, and against defendant, R. E. Claunch, is amended to read $3,-482.94.

The judgment in favor of plaintiff, Virgil Elkins, and against defendants, R. E. Claunch and Highway Insurance Under[827]*827writers, is amended to read $247.18, and the judgment in favor of plaintiff, Virgil El-kins, and against defendant, R. E. Claunch, is amended to read $272.57.

In all other respects the judgments in favor of these plaintiffs are to remain as written. As amended, the entire judgment is affirmed, with costs of both courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 So. 2d 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elkins-v-claunch-lactapp-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack