Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. By-Products Coal Co.

35 S.W.2d 898, 237 Ky. 436, 1931 Ky. LEXIS 641
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedJanuary 27, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 S.W.2d 898 (Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. By-Products Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. By-Products Coal Co., 35 S.W.2d 898, 237 Ky. 436, 1931 Ky. LEXIS 641 (Ky. 1931).

Opinion

*437 Opinion op the Court by

Judge Willis

Reversing.

This case involves the interpretation of a coal mining lease. The lessor complains of a judgment in favor of the lessee. The particular controversy concerns the right of the tenant to have credited against the “minimum royalty” reserved by the lease a payment made in accordance with the contract for “coal lost” by improper mining. The question arises in this way: The Eikhorn Coal Company sued the By-Products Coal Company, J. P. Burton, and Cadwalader Jones to recover a balance of $2,088.64 claimed as minimum royalty for a year ending April 30, 1926. It was admitted that only $28,-196.36 had been paid as royalty upon coal actually mined for the period, but the answer alleged that defendants in addition had paid the sum of $2,500.44 for coal lost, and the aggregate of the twTo payments in that year exceeded the minimum royalty of $30,285 called for by the contract. A demurrer to the answer was overruled, the plaintiff stood thereon, and the action was dismissed. Hence, the appeal by it.

The lease was given by the Eikhorn Coal Company to the defendants Burton and Jones, and they had assigned it to the defendant company. The consent of the lessor to the assignment was conditioned on the assignors remaining liable to it on the covenants of the lease.

The lease covered 3,024 acres of coal land located in Floyd county, Ky., and continued in force until all the minable and merchantable coal therein was exhausted.

The covenants of the lessee respecting the payments to be made under the lease were:

“To pay the ‘lessor,’ its successor or assigns, during the continuance of this lease, as rental for said coal and mining rights and privileges, subject to the provisions hereinafter contained with reference to coal used upon the premises by ‘lessees’ a royalty of Fifteen (15c) cents for each and every ton of two thousand pounds of mine run for all coal mined upon, or used upon, or shipped from said tracts or parcels of land, and that during the year, beginning May 1, 1924, and ending May 1,1925; they will pay to ‘lessor’ a minimum royalty of Fifteen Thousand One Hundred Forty-two Dollars and fifty cents ($15,142.50) and during the year beginning May I, 1925, and ending May 1, 1926, they will pay *438 to ‘lessor’ a minimum royalty of Thirty Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-Five Dollars ($30,285.00) and for each succeeding year thereafter during the continuance of this lease they will pay to ‘lessor’ a minimum royalty of Thirty Thousand, Two Hundred and Eighty-five ($30,285.00) Dollars, even if the quantity of coal mined in said years respectively, at the royalty aforesaid, shall not produce that amount of rental or royalty. Said minimum royalty or rental is to be paid semi-annually not later than the 25th day of November and May of each year, provided, further that if the said ‘lessees’ their successors or assigns, fail in any year after May to mine a sufficient quantity of coal to pay the aforesaid minimum rental, then they shall and do have the right in any succeeding year during the life of this lease, and after the minimum for said succeeding year shall have been mined and paid for to mine and remove sufficient coal free of rental or royalty to reimburse themselves for the rental in such preceeding year or years, but no credit shall be carried forward to any subsequent year for coal mined in excess of the minimum paid.
“On the 25th day of the month succeeding the end of each fiscal year as hereinbefore declared to be beginning May 1, and ending May 1, of the succeeding year there shall be a readjustment of all payments made for and on account of such year, to the end that the total of such payments shall never exceed the amount of royalty produced by the coal actually mined and shipped during each year, when the amount of royalty so produced equals or exceeds the minimum annual rental hereinbefore provided for. For the purpose of this paragraph the year shall be treated as beginning May. 1.
“ ‘Lessees’ covenant and agree to save the ‘lessor’ harmless from any and all loss of coal mined and stocked, upon but not shipped from the premises; and should coal so stocked be lost or destroyed, or so injured as to prevent its being marketed or shipped from the premises the royalty in this lease provided shall thereupon become due and paAmble at the first monthly payment occurring after such loss or damage.
“After all of the said minable and merchantable coal shall have been paid for by the said ‘les *439 sees’ either in the form of royalty or minimum rental, as hereinbefore provided, the said ‘lessees’ shall and do have the right to mine, excavate and remove the coal so paid for, but not mined and removed, without being required to make any further payments on account thereof. Provided, however, that after all the said minable and merchantable coal shall have been paid for by the ‘lessees’ as herein-before provided, they shall continue to prosecute their mining operations in such manner, and with -such dispatch as to mine, excavate and remove the coal so paid for but not heretofore mined or removed within such reasonable time as the railroad facilities and market and labor conditions will permit. And in case the said ‘lessees’ their successors or assigns shall elect to cease operations for any period after all the said minable and merchantable coal shall have been paid for as provided, they shall, during such period, pay to the said ‘lessor’ its successors or assigns, as a rental for the said mining rights and privileges at the rate of $2.00 per acre per year for each acre overlying minable and merchantable coal remaining unmined, said payment to be made monthly as hereinafter provided during such time as the said ‘lessees’ their successors or assigns shall have ceased to so mine and operate the premises. ’ ’

(Provisions as to monthly payment of accrued royalties omitted.)

“The ‘lessees’ on or before the 15th day of each calendar month shall furnish to the ‘lessor’ its agents, or attorneys, a report showing the quantity of coal taken from the said tracts or parcels of land during the preceding calendar month using the weights furnished by the. railroad company over whose railroad the coal is shipped at its first weighing point, for all coal so taken and shipped by rail, said report to show date loading of each railroad car, railroad car initials, numbers and weights; and, if any coal shall be taken, and not shipped by rail, the quantity thereof shall be ascertained in a manner satisfactory to the engineers of the ‘lessor’. The ‘lessees’ shall also comply with any further reasonable rules and regulations that may be prescribed by the engineer of the'‘lessor’ for the cor *440 rect ascertainment and report of the quantity of coal mined hereunder. . . .
“That if at any time the ‘lessees’ shall not conduct their mining operations according to the general plans provided for under Article 7 hereof, or according to plans approved by arbitration, or according to modern and efficient methods of mining, and loss of coal shall thereby result, then ‘lessees’ shall pay ‘lessor’ for coal so lost at the rate of royalty hereinbefore provided.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.
200 F.2d 754 (Eighth Circuit, 1953)
Carter v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.
102 F. Supp. 280 (N.D. Iowa, 1952)
Anderson v. UNITED COAL AND COKE COMPANY
227 P.2d 700 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1951)
Gorman v. Lusk
109 S.W.2d 625 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.W.2d 898, 237 Ky. 436, 1931 Ky. LEXIS 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elkhorn-coal-corp-v-by-products-coal-co-kyctapphigh-1931.