Elkem Metals v. United States
This text of 2005 CIT 134 (Elkem Metals v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 05 - 134
J U D G M E N T
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Senior Judge
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x ELKEM METALS COMPANY and GLOBE METAL- LURGICAL INC., :
Plaintiffs, : Consolidated v. : Court No. 01-00098
UNITED STATES, :
Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
The parties having interposed motions pursuant to USCIT
Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the record compiled by the Interna-
tional Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("ITA")
sub nom. Silicon Metal From Brazil; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Determination Not To Revoke in Part,
66 Fed.Reg. 11,256 (Feb. 23, 2001); and the court in slip opinion
04-36, 28 CIT (April 15, 2004), having granted the motion of
intervenor-defendant Companhia Brasileira Carbureto de Cálcio
("CBCC") and the motion of Eletrosilex S/A to the extent of remand
to the ITA to impute anew (1) CBCC's home-market credit costs and
(2) Eletrosilex's margin of dumping for the period of review impli-
cated that is in accordance with law and supported by substantial
evidence on the record; and the defendant having filed the ITA's
Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (July 14,
2004), stating (1) "CBCC's dumping margin for the period of [re- Consolidated Court No. 01-00098 Page 2
view] is zero percent" and (2) "Eletrosilex's dumping margin for
th[at] period . . . is 61.58 percent . . . changed from the rate
[93.20%] announced in the . . . final results of the eighth
administrative review" at issue herein; and those Final Results of
Redetermination having pointed out that Eletrosilex offered no
comment to the ITA on its proposed rate change prior to publica-
tion; and the court's slip opinion 04-36 having afforded all of the
parties an opportunity to comment herein on those ITA Final Results of Redetermination; and no party having done so; and the court
having heretofore awaited the opinions in other actions with
similar or related issue(s) and then taken them into account; Now
therefore, after due deliberation, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the ITA's Final Re-
sults of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (July 14, 2004)
be, and they hereby are, affirmed.
Dated: New York, New York October 6, 2005
Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2005 CIT 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elkem-metals-v-united-states-cit-2005.