Elkem Metals v. United States

2005 CIT 134
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedOctober 6, 2005
DocketConsol. 01-00098
StatusPublished

This text of 2005 CIT 134 (Elkem Metals v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elkem Metals v. United States, 2005 CIT 134 (cit 2005).

Opinion

Slip Op. 05 - 134

J U D G M E N T

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Senior Judge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x ELKEM METALS COMPANY and GLOBE METAL- LURGICAL INC., :

Plaintiffs, : Consolidated v. : Court No. 01-00098

UNITED STATES, :

Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

The parties having interposed motions pursuant to USCIT

Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the record compiled by the Interna-

tional Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("ITA")

sub nom. Silicon Metal From Brazil; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Determination Not To Revoke in Part,

66 Fed.Reg. 11,256 (Feb. 23, 2001); and the court in slip opinion

04-36, 28 CIT (April 15, 2004), having granted the motion of

intervenor-defendant Companhia Brasileira Carbureto de Cálcio

("CBCC") and the motion of Eletrosilex S/A to the extent of remand

to the ITA to impute anew (1) CBCC's home-market credit costs and

(2) Eletrosilex's margin of dumping for the period of review impli-

cated that is in accordance with law and supported by substantial

evidence on the record; and the defendant having filed the ITA's

Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (July 14,

2004), stating (1) "CBCC's dumping margin for the period of [re- Consolidated Court No. 01-00098 Page 2

view] is zero percent" and (2) "Eletrosilex's dumping margin for

th[at] period . . . is 61.58 percent . . . changed from the rate

[93.20%] announced in the . . . final results of the eighth

administrative review" at issue herein; and those Final Results of

Redetermination having pointed out that Eletrosilex offered no

comment to the ITA on its proposed rate change prior to publica-

tion; and the court's slip opinion 04-36 having afforded all of the

parties an opportunity to comment herein on those ITA Final Results of Redetermination; and no party having done so; and the court

having heretofore awaited the opinions in other actions with

similar or related issue(s) and then taken them into account; Now

therefore, after due deliberation, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the ITA's Final Re-

sults of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (July 14, 2004)

be, and they hereby are, affirmed.

Dated: New York, New York October 6, 2005

Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2005 CIT 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elkem-metals-v-united-states-cit-2005.