Elkady v. Very Ltd.

8 A.D.3d 197, 778 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8862

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered January 21, 2004, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs were injured at defendant’s bar when they were attacked by another group of patrons. There is sufficient evidence that a triable issue exists as to whether defendant, through its agents, failed to intervene in a timely fashion in the altercation, in light of conflicting testimony as to the length of time that the [198] incident lasted (Banayan v F.W. Woolworth Co., 211 AD2d 591, 592 [1995]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Lerner and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elkady v. Very Ltd., 8 A.D.3d 197, 778 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 197 (Elkady v. Very Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banayan v. F.W. Woolworth Co.
211 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)