Elizundia v. De Elizundia
775 So. 2d 990, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15439, 2000 WL 1744805
Opinion
Affirmed. Smith v. Smith, 150 Conn. 15, 183 A.2d 848 (1962); Matter of Terrence [991]*991K., 135 A.D.2d 857, 522 N.Y.S.2d 949 (1987); Izmery v. Izmery, 559 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Suarez Ortega v. Pujals de Suarez, 465 So.2d 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); 12A Fla.Jur.2d Courts & Judges § 91 (1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elizundia v. De Elizundia, 775 So. 2d 990, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15439, 2000 WL 1744805 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
775 So. 2d 990 (Elizundia v. De Elizundia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Suarez Ortega v. Pujals De Suarez
465 So. 2d 607 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Izmery v. Izmery
559 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Smith v. Smith
183 A.2d 848 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1962)
In re Terrence K.
135 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)