Elizondo, Mark Anthony v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: July 1, 2004
• Docket: 14-03-00745-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 1, 2004

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 1, 2004.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-00744-CR

NO. 14-03-00745-CR

MARK ANTHONY ELIZONDO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 900,273 & 900,274

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery.  On June 26, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed written notices of appeal. 

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed two briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit.  The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of each of counsel=s briefs was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and no motion to review the record or pro se response has been filed.

We agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 1, 2004.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).