Elizarov v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Elizarov v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.

45 A.D.3d 327, 845 N.Y.S.2d 263

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.3d 327 (Elizarov v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elizarov v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., 45 A.D.3d 327, 845 N.Y.S.2d 263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J), entered September 13, 2006, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant offered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for plaintiffs termination (see St. Mary’s Honor Center v Hicks, 509 US 502 [1993]; Matter of Laverock & Haines v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 88 NY2d 734, 738 [1996]). Plaintiff offered no evidence in response to controvert defendant’s proof that economic conditions required cost-cutting, resulting in significant job layoffs, or that defendant’s downsizing was contrived for the purpose of terminating him (see Alvarado v Hotel Salisbury, Inc., 38 AD3d 398 [2007]; Bailey v New York Westchester Sq. Med. Ctr., 38 AD3d 119 [2007]). Furthermore, because plaintiff conceded that his vacation request was granted by defendant and that he was permitted to attend religious services during his lunch hour, the court properly dismissed his “failure to accommodate” claim (see Nichols v Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr., 36 AD3d 426 [2007]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J), entered September 13, 2006, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant offered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for plaintiffs termination (see St. Mary’s Honor Center v Hicks, 509 US 502 [1993]; Matter of Laverock & Haines v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 88 NY2d 734, 738 [1996]). Plaintiff offered no evidence in response to controvert defendant’s proof that economic conditions required cost-cutting, resulting in significant job layoffs, or that defendant’s downsizing was contrived for the purpose of terminating him (see Alvarado v Hotel Salisbury, Inc., 38 AD3d 398 [2007]; Bailey v New York Westchester Sq. Med. Ctr., 38 AD3d 119 [2007]). Furthermore, because plaintiff conceded that his vacation request was granted by defendant and that he was permitted to attend religious services during his lunch hour, the court properly dismissed his “failure to accommodate” claim (see Nichols v Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr., 36 AD3d 426 [2007]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.3d 327, 845 N.Y.S.2d 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizarov-v-martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack