Elizagarate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Elizagarate v. State

632 So. 2d 109, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 770, 1994 WL 34076

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1994·No. No. 93-1993·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal seeks review of an order denying a motion to correct an alleged illegal sentence. Many grounds are urged for reversal, save and except that which relates to the retention of jurisdiction, all are without merit. We do find error in the order as it relates to retaining jurisdiction, and reverse so much of same as it relates to that issue. We return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the reasoning set forth in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal seeks review of an order denying a motion to correct an alleged illegal sentence. Many grounds are urged for reversal, save and except that which relates to the retention of jurisdiction, all are without merit. We do find error in the order as it relates to retaining jurisdiction, and reverse so much of same as it relates to that issue. We return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the reasoning set forth in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, with directions.

Elizagarate v. State, 632 So. 2d 109, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 770, 1994 WL 34076 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

632 So. 2d 109 (Elizagarate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related