Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Elizagarate v. State

Elizagarate v. State

632 So. 2d 109, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 770, 1994 WL 34076
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1993
StatusPublished

This text of 632 So. 2d 109 (Elizagarate v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elizagarate v. State, 632 So. 2d 109, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 770, 1994 WL 34076 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal seeks review of an order denying a motion to correct an alleged illegal sentence. Many grounds are urged for reversal, save and except that which relates to the retention of jurisdiction, all are without merit. We do find error in the order as it relates to retaining jurisdiction, and reverse so much of same as it relates to that issue. We return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the reasoning set forth in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacIas v. State
614 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 109, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 770, 1994 WL 34076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizagarate-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.