Elizabeth Youngblood v. State
This text of Elizabeth Youngblood v. State (Elizabeth Youngblood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-06-00738-CR
Elizabeth YOUNGBLOOD,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas ,
Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2006-CR-4804B
Honorable Philip Kazen, Jr. , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone , Justice
Sarah B. Duncan , Justice
Karen Angelini , Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 6, 2006
DISMISSED
The trial court's certification in this appeal states that the case is a "plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of
appeal." Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, "[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification
that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(d). On November 20, 2006, appellant's appellate counsel notified this court that appellant does not have a right to
appeal in this case. Counsel further indicated that appellant would not file an amended trial court certification showing that
she has the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex.
App.--San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant's counsel that Rule 25.2(d)
requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elizabeth Youngblood v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizabeth-youngblood-v-state-texapp-2006.