Elizabeth Weyel v. James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA F/K/A State Bank & Trust of Seguin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Elizabeth Weyel v. James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA F/K/A State Bank & Trust of Seguin

DecidedAugust 1, 2014

Docket04-14-00085-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Elizabeth Weyel v. James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA F/K/A State Bank & Trust of Seguin (Elizabeth Weyel v. James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA F/K/A State Bank & Trust of Seguin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elizabeth Weyel v. James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA F/K/A State Bank & Trust of Seguin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Jfourtfj Court of gntomo,

August 1,2014

No. 04-14-00085-CV

Elizabeth Weyel, Appellant

v.

James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA f/k/a State Bank & Trust of Seguin, Appellees

Trial Court Case No. 12-1630-CV

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on September 10, 2014, to the following panel: Justice Marion, Justice Barnard, and Justice Chapa. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on August 1,2014.

Sandee Marionfjustice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said court on this August 1, 2014.

* 5

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jfourtfj Court of gntomo,

August 1,2014

No. 04-14-00085-CV

Elizabeth Weyel, Appellant

v.

James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA f/k/a State Bank & Trust of Seguin, Appellees

Trial Court Case No. 12-1630-CV

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on September 10, 2014, to the following panel: Justice Marion, Justice Barnard, and Justice Chapa. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on August 1,2014.

Sandee Marionfjustice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said court on this August 1, 2014.

* 5

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Elizabeth Weyel v. James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA F/K/A State Bank & Trust of Seguin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizabeth-weyel-v-james-hopson-and-american-bank-o-texapp-2014.