Elizabeth v. Public Utility Com'rs
123 A. 358, 99 N.J.L. 496, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 169
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, ACKERSON, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None. *Page 500
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elizabeth v. Public Utility Com'rs, 123 A. 358, 99 N.J.L. 496, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 169 (N.J. 1924).
123 A. 358 (Elizabeth v. Public Utility Com'rs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
8 A.2d 350 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939)