Elizabeth R. Cartwright, in Error v. Alexander T. Howe, George F. Richards, and William Richards

42 U.S. 188, 11 L. Ed. 97, 1 How. 188, 1843 U.S. LEXIS 296
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 15, 1843·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This cause came on to'be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, holden in and for the comity of. Washington, and it having been stated by Mr. Bradley, of counsel for the defendant in error, that the matters in-controversy had been agreed and settled between the parties, to which Mr. R. J. Brent, of counsel for'the. plaintiff in error, assented;'.it-, is thereupon now here ordered, and adjudged by this court that this cause bé-and the same is hereby dismissed, with costs..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elizabeth R. Cartwright, in Error v. Alexander T. Howe, George F. Richards, and William Richards, 42 U.S. 188, 11 L. Ed. 97, 1 How. 188, 1843 U.S. LEXIS 296 (1843).

42 U.S. 188 (Elizabeth R. Cartwright, in Error v. Alexander T. Howe, George F. Richards, and William Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Owens
38 S.W. 976 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1897)