ELIZABETH MAYA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc.
This text of ELIZABETH MAYA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc. (ELIZABETH MAYA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 18, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-259 Lower Tribunal No. 19-7742 ________________
Elizabeth Maya, Appellant,
vs.
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.
Elizabeth Maya, in proper person.
Lapin & Leichtling, LLP, and Benjamin B. Carter and Adam B. Leichtling, for appellee.
Before SCALES, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Spikes v. OneWest Bank FSB, 106 So. 3d 475, 478-79 (Fla.
4th DCA 2012) (“A third party who advances the purchase price is entitled to an equitable vendor’s lien. . . . Generally, when an equitable lien is imposed on a
homestead purchased with fraudulently obtained funds, the homestead exemption
from forced sale does not apply to either spouse, even if one spouse is innocent or
ignorant of wrongdoing.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ELIZABETH MAYA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizabeth-maya-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-company-etc-fladistctapp-2020.