ELIZABETH MAYA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 2020·No. 20-0259·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed November 18, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D20-259

Lower Tribunal No. 19-7742

Elizabeth Maya,

Appellant,

vs.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.

Elizabeth Maya, in proper person.

Lapin & Leichtling, LLP, and Benjamin B. Carter and Adam B. Leichtling, for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Spikes v. OneWest Bank FSB, 106 So. 3d 475, 478-79 (Fla.

4th DCA 2012) (“A third party who advances the purchase price is entitled to an

equitable vendor’s lien. . . . Generally, when an equitable lien is imposed on a homestead purchased with fraudulently obtained funds, the homestead exemption from forced sale does not apply to either spouse, even if one spouse is innocent or ignorant of wrongdoing.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ELIZABETH MAYA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

ELIZABETH MAYA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc. (ELIZABETH MAYA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spikes v. OneWest Bank FSB
106 So. 3d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)