Elizabeth Marie Conn v. Devin Patrick Conn
This text of Elizabeth Marie Conn v. Devin Patrick Conn (Elizabeth Marie Conn v. Devin Patrick Conn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00185-CV
Elizabeth Marie Conn, Appellant
v.
Devin Patrick Conn, Appellee
FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-22-000423, THE HONORABLE CATHERINE MAUZY, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
After twice abating this appeal on appellant’s unopposed motions for filing of a
supplemental reporter’s record containing exhibits and a hearing transcript that appellant says are
currently missing from the record, this Court received appellant’s notice that the parties dispute
whether “certain exhibits were offered into evidence and whether the court reporter can create a
supplemental reporter’s record of the disputed exhibits as identified by the court reporter.”1
Appellant asserts that the missing exhibits and transcript she identified are necessary to the
resolution of this appeal from the trial court’s final decree of divorce. See Tex. R. App. P.
34.6(f)(3).
When a portion of a reporter’s record is lost or destroyed, an appellant is entitled
to a new trial if, among other requirements, a significant portion of the court reporter’s notes and
1 The court reporter notified this Court that the parties’ attorneys were trying to sort through exhibits that were not provided at the time of trial. records has been lost or destroyed, the lost or destroyed portion of the reporter’s record is
necessary to the appeal’s resolution, and the lost or destroyed portion of the reporter’s record
cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties. See id. R. 34.6(f). We therefore reinstate and
abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for determination of whether any
exhibits admitted into evidence are missing and whether those exhibits and any missing
transcript can be replaced by agreement of the parties or with a copy accurately duplicating with
reasonable certainty the originals. See id. R. 34.6(f)(4). A supplemental reporter’s record
containing the trial court’s determination as well as copies of any missing exhibits and transcript,
if available, shall be filed with this Court by May 30, 2025. This appeal will be reinstated after
the supplemental reporter’s record is filed.
It is ordered on April 30, 2025.
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
Abated and Remanded
Filed: April 30, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elizabeth Marie Conn v. Devin Patrick Conn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizabeth-marie-conn-v-devin-patrick-conn-texapp-2025.