Elizabeth King v. Department of Defense
This text of 53 F.3d 344 (Elizabeth King v. Department of Defense) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
53 F.3d 344
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Elizabeth KING, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent.
No. 94-3300.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
June 7, 1994.
ORDER
The petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is
ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.
Petitioner's brief is due on or before June 28, 1994.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.3d 344, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40792, 1994 WL 746445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizabeth-king-v-department-of-defense-cafc-1994.