Elizabeth Gonzalez v. Banaco II LLC
This text of Elizabeth Gonzalez v. Banaco II LLC (Elizabeth Gonzalez v. Banaco II LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED □□□ naan cence nnnn nnnnnncccmnnnnneeX DOC #: DATE FILED:_1/3/2020___ ANA ELIZABETH GONZALEZ, : Plaintiff, : : 19 Civ. 5602 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER BANACO IT LLC, ET AL., : Defendants. :
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on December 6, 2019, the parties filed a joint letter and settlement agreement (“Agreement”), for review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). It is hereby ORDERED that approval of the settlement agreement is DENIED, without prejudice to renewal, once counsel has corrected the below mistakes or ambiguities in the Agreement. Only upon correction can the fairness and reasonableness of the Agreement be ascertained. See Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 206-07; Wolinsky v. Scholastic, Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335-36 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (outlining the factors for determining whether proposed settlement is fair and reasonable): 1. In the final paragraph of section | (beginning “Concurrently with the execution”), the rights and duties of a provision are unclear due to a critical typo. The Agreement states: “The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the Confessions of Judgments will be held in escrow by Plaintiff Gonzalez’s hereby irrevocably and unconditionally releases counsel, and will not be entered and/or filed at any time other than... .’” Counsel shall correct this provision; 2. The final sentences in each of the sections 1(a)-(d) of the Agreement state that “Determination of the Plaintiff Gonzalez’s share, counsel fees, and costs, is the responsibility solely of the Plaintiff Gonzalez and their counsel” (emphasis added). This
sentence is inaccurate, as the Court determines the proper fees. Counsel shall (4) amend or omit each instance of this sentence in the Agreement, and (11) include in the Agreement the specific amount of attorney’s fees and costs Plaintiff's counsel seeks; 3. Inthe Affidavits of Confession of Judgment, attached as Exhibits A and B to the Agreement (“Affidavits”), paragraph 5 states: “This affidavit of confession of judgment is for a debt justly due to Plaintiff under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, to which this Affidavit is annexed, which provides that Defendants are to submit a total sum of $34,500.00 to Plaintiff’ (emphasis added). The Agreement, however, provides only that Defendants will pay Plaintiff $23,000, and nowhere contains a $34,500 figure -- yet contradictorily, the Affidavits claim that the Agreement itself “provides [that] Defendants are to submit a total sum of $34,500.00 to Plaintiff.” The Affidavits alone reference the $34,500 figure, claiming that it “represents the settlement amount of $23,000.00 plus liquidated damages of $11,500.” The Affidavits do not explain what the “liquidated damages” are. Counsel shall correct the inconsistency between the Agreement and Affidavits, as identified in the underlined provision above, and elsewhere as needed. Counsel may clarify what the $11,500 liquidated damages and/or the $34,500 figure are. It is further ORDERED that counsel shall file the revised executed Agreement, Affidavits and accompanying materials by January 16, 2020.
Dated: January 3, 2020 y New York, New York LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elizabeth Gonzalez v. Banaco II LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizabeth-gonzalez-v-banaco-ii-llc-nysd-2020.