Elizabeth Duffy v. Ally et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided June 30, 2026·No. 1:26-cv-00423·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Elizabeth Duffy

v. Case No. 26-cv-423-LM-AJ

Ally et al.

ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 2, 2026. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres- Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.”). The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case.

____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States District Judge

Date: June 30, 2026

cc: Elizabeth Duffy, pro se

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elizabeth Duffy v. Ally et al., (D.N.H. 2026).

Elizabeth Duffy v. Ally et al. (Elizabeth Duffy v. Ally et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

School Union No. 37 v. United National Insurance
617 F.3d 554 (First Circuit, 2010)
Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno
842 F.3d 163 (First Circuit, 2016)
Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc.
62 F.4th 1 (First Circuit, 2023)