Elizabeth Davila Payne v. Patrick D. West
This text of Elizabeth Davila Payne v. Patrick D. West (Elizabeth Davila Payne v. Patrick D. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-398-CV
ELIZABETH DAVILA PAYNE APPELLANT
V.
PATRICK D. WEST APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
On February 10, 2010, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, LIVINGSTON, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 18, 2010
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elizabeth Davila Payne v. Patrick D. West, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizabeth-davila-payne-v-patrick-d-west-texapp-2010.