Elizabeth Broome Realty Corp. v. Fan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Elizabeth Broome Realty Corp. v. Fan

244 A.D.2d 158, 665 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11074

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 244 A.D.2d 158 (Elizabeth Broome Realty Corp. v. Fan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elizabeth Broome Realty Corp. v. Fan, 244 A.D.2d 158, 665 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered August 18, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded plaintiff the sum of $2,268,992.30 against defendant-appellant and discharged two mechanic’s liens filed by defendant-appellant, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We decline to disturb the trial court’s factual findings, especially given that such findings rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses. Reliable evidence supports all of the trial court’s factual conclusions. Defendant-appellant’s contentions represent nothing more than its own self-serving view of the evidence, which gives this Court no reason to disturb the subject judgment (see, Daley v Related Cos., 236 AD2d 340). The liens were properly discharged (see, Charles Hyman, Inc. v Olsen Indus., 227 AD2d 270). We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered August 18, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded plaintiff the sum of $2,268,992.30 against defendant-appellant and discharged two mechanic’s liens filed by defendant-appellant, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We decline to disturb the trial court’s factual findings, especially given that such findings rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses. Reliable evidence supports all of the trial court’s factual conclusions. Defendant-appellant’s contentions represent nothing more than its own self-serving view of the evidence, which gives this Court no reason to disturb the subject judgment (see, Daley v Related Cos., 236 AD2d 340). The liens were properly discharged (see, Charles Hyman, Inc. v Olsen Indus., 227 AD2d 270). We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 158, 665 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elizabeth-broome-realty-corp-v-fan-nyappdiv-1997.