Eliud M. Montalvo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Eliud M. Montalvo v. State

220 So. 3d 1276, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9129, 2017 WL 2729865

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 2017

DocketCase 5D17-39

StatusPublished

This text of 220 So. 3d 1276 (Eliud M. Montalvo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eliud M. Montalvo v. State, 220 So. 3d 1276, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9129, 2017 WL 2729865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eliud Mártir Montalvo appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court erroneously denied Montalvo’s timely filed amended motion, we reverse and remand.

Montalvo filed a timely rule 3.850 motion asserting numerous claims. The trial court struck the motion, giving him leave to amend within sixty days, because he failed to allege how he was prejudiced. Montalvo timely moved for an extension of time to file his amended motion. The trial court granted the motion and gave Montalvo until September 12, 2016, to file his amended motion. Pursuant to the mailbox rule in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420, as evidenced by the prison mail stamp, Montalvo filed his amended post-conviction motion on July 29, 2016. However, for reasons not apparent from the record, the motion was not docketed by the clerk of court until December 8, 2016. That same day, apparently unaware that an amended motion had been filed, the trial court entered an order denying the original motion, concluding that Montalvo had “failed to amend his motion for postconviction relief.”

Based on the prison mail stamp, the amended motion was timely. Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the timely filed amended rule 3.850 motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eliud Mártir Montalvo appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court erroneously denied Montalvo’s timely filed amended motion, we reverse and remand.

Montalvo filed a timely rule 3.850 motion asserting numerous claims. The trial court struck the motion, giving him leave to amend within sixty days, because he failed to allege how he was prejudiced. Montalvo timely moved for an extension of time to file his amended motion. The trial court granted the motion and gave Montalvo until September 12, 2016, to file his amended motion. Pursuant to the mailbox rule in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420, as evidenced by the prison mail stamp, Montalvo filed his amended post-conviction motion on July 29, 2016. However, for reasons not apparent from the record, the motion was not docketed by the clerk of court until December 8, 2016. That same day, apparently unaware that an amended motion had been filed, the trial court entered an order denying the original motion, concluding that Montalvo had “failed to amend his motion for postconviction relief.”

Based on the prison mail stamp, the amended motion was timely. Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the timely filed amended rule 3.850 motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 So. 3d 1276, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9129, 2017 WL 2729865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eliud-m-montalvo-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.