Elite Formal Accessories v. Roman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Elite Formal Accessories v. Roman

850 So. 2d 672, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11438, 2003 WL 21749068

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 30, 2003

DocketNo. 1D02-2600

StatusPublished

This text of 850 So. 2d 672 (Elite Formal Accessories v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elite Formal Accessories v. Roman, 850 So. 2d 672, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11438, 2003 WL 21749068 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, we direct the judge of compensation claims on remand to correct the scrivener’s error in paragraph 1 of the Order on Employer/Carrier’s Amended Motion for Rehearing so that it reads: “The Final Order is hereby corrected to reflect that the employer/carrier shall pay the claimant temporary partial disability benefits from October 1, 1999, to August 31, 2001.”; and to correct the second numbered paragraph of that order (incorrectly numbered “3”) so that it reads: “2. Paragraph 4 of the adjudicatory portion of the Final Order (on page 14 thereof), referring to temporary total disability payments, is stricken in its entirety.” We affirm, without discussion, as to all other issues raised by the appeal and cross-appeal.

[673]*673AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

KAHN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, we direct the judge of compensation claims on remand to correct the scrivener’s error in paragraph 1 of the Order on Employer/Carrier’s Amended Motion for Rehearing so that it reads: “The Final Order is hereby corrected to reflect that the employer/carrier shall pay the claimant temporary partial disability benefits from October 1, 1999, to August 31, 2001.”; and to correct the second numbered paragraph of that order (incorrectly numbered “3”) so that it reads: “2. Paragraph 4 of the adjudicatory portion of the Final Order (on page 14 thereof), referring to temporary total disability payments, is stricken in its entirety.” We affirm, without discussion, as to all other issues raised by the appeal and cross-appeal.

[673]*673AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

KAHN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

850 So. 2d 672, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11438, 2003 WL 21749068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elite-formal-accessories-v-roman-fladistctapp-2003.