Elisha Ham, Jr. v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Elisha Ham, Jr. v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

484 F.2d 1382, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7436

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 19, 1973·No. 73-2175·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The decision of the District Court denying habeas relief for failure to exhaust state remedies is affirmed. 1 Cf., on the merits, Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973).

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The decision of the District Court denying habeas relief for failure to exhaust state remedies is affirmed. 1 Cf., on the merits, Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973).

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Elisha Ham, Jr. v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 484 F.2d 1382, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7436 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

484 F.2d 1382 (Elisha Ham, Jr. v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related