ELISEO CARANTO ARCEO v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive

S.D. California

ELISEO CARANTO ARCEO v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive

DecidedJanuary 27, 2026

Docket3:25-cv-03124

StatusUnknown

This text of ELISEO CARANTO ARCEO v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive (ELISEO CARANTO ARCEO v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ELISEO CARANTO ARCEO v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, (S.D. Cal. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELISEO CARANTO ARCEO, Case No.: 25-cv-3124-AJB-DDL

12 ORDER PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS’ FEES, 13 COSTS, AND EXPENSES v. 14 JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH (Doc. No. 16) 15 AMERICA, LLC; and DOES 1 through 16 10, inclusive,

17 Defendants. 18 19 20 On November 10, 2025, Plaintiff Eliseo Caranto Arceo (“Plaintiff”) commenced this 21 action against Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (“Defendant”). (Doc. 22 No. 1.) On January 16, 2026, Plaintiff Eliseo Caranto Arceo filed a notice of acceptance of 23 Defendant’s offer of judgment made pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure. (Doc. No. 13.) Plaintiff attached the offer as Exhibit 1 to his request for entry 25 of judgment. (Id., Ex. 1.) The Court granted the request for entry of judgment (Doc. No. 26 14) and the clerk entered judgment in Plaintiff’s favor in the amount of $28,500.00 (Doc. 27 No. 15). The parties now jointly moved for an entry of order in the amount of $17,000.00 28 for Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. (Doc. No. 16.) 1 Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in relevant part that 2 [a]t least 14 days before the date set for trial, a party defending against a claim may serve on an opposing party an offer to allow 3 judgment on specified terms, with the costs then accrued. If, 4 within 14 days after being served, the opposing party serves written notice accepting the offer, either party may then file the 5 offer and notice of acceptance, plus proof of service. The clerk 6 must then enter judgment. 7 Accordingly, a plaintiff who accepts an offer of judgment is entitled to “costs then 8 accrued.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 68; Holland v. Roeser, 37 F.3d 501, 503 (9th Cir. 1994). When 9 the term “costs” is used in an offer of judgment, it is read to include all costs awardable 10 under the relevant substantive statute, in this case California Civil Code § 1794(d). Marek 11 v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985); Fisher v. Kelly, 105 F.3d 350 (7th Cir. 1997). In other words, 12 a plaintiff who accepts a Rule 68 offer is entitled to attorneys’ fees accrued at the time of 13 the offer so long as the underlying statute provides for costs. Holland, 37 F.3d at 503 (citing 14 Marek, 473 U.S. at 9). 15 On January 26, 2026, the parties filed a stipulation as to Plaintiff’s fees, costs, and 16 expenses. (Doc. No. 16.) Therein, the parties stipulate to Defendant paying $17,000.00 to 17 resolve Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, to be satisfied by March 16, 2026. 18 (Id.) After satisfaction of payment, Plaintiff will dismiss this case with prejudice within 19 ten business days against all parties. (Id.) 20 In Defendant’s offer of judgment, Defendant states it will “pay Plaintiff’s costs, 21 expenses and attorney fees allowable under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 54(d) 22 and Civil Code sec. 1794(d). Attorney fees authorized by Civil Code section 1794(d) are 23 to be determined by the Court by way of a noticed motion.” (Doc. No. 13, Ex. 1 ¶ 2.) The 24 offer of judgment further provides that “Plaintiff may recover for fees and costs reasonably 25 and actually incurred in bringing said noticed motion.” (Id.) 26 Rather than filing a noticed motion, the parties filed the instant joint stipulation. 27 (Doc. No. 16.) The Court finds the parties have demonstrated good cause by stipulating to 28 Plaintiff’s award of attorneys’ fees and costs. See Meza v. FCA US, LLC, No. 1:22-CV- 1 }}00828-ADA-EPG, 2023 WL 4305110 (E.D. Cal. June 30, 2023) (finding a joint stipulation 2 || good cause for entry of attorneys’ fees under Civil Code Section 1794(d)). Thus, the Court 3 || GRANTS the parties’ stipulation and directs Defendant to pay $17,000.00 to Plaintiff by 4 || March 16, 2026. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: January 27, 2026 □

8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELISEO CARANTO ARCEO, Case No.: 25-cv-3124-AJB-DDL

12 ORDER PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS’ FEES, 13 COSTS, AND EXPENSES v. 14 JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH (Doc. No. 16) 15 AMERICA, LLC; and DOES 1 through 16 10, inclusive,

17 Defendants. 18 19 20 On November 10, 2025, Plaintiff Eliseo Caranto Arceo (“Plaintiff”) commenced this 21 action against Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (“Defendant”). (Doc. 22 No. 1.) On January 16, 2026, Plaintiff Eliseo Caranto Arceo filed a notice of acceptance of 23 Defendant’s offer of judgment made pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure. (Doc. No. 13.) Plaintiff attached the offer as Exhibit 1 to his request for entry 25 of judgment. (Id., Ex. 1.) The Court granted the request for entry of judgment (Doc. No. 26 14) and the clerk entered judgment in Plaintiff’s favor in the amount of $28,500.00 (Doc. 27 No. 15). The parties now jointly moved for an entry of order in the amount of $17,000.00 28 for Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. (Doc. No. 16.) 1 Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in relevant part that 2 [a]t least 14 days before the date set for trial, a party defending against a claim may serve on an opposing party an offer to allow 3 judgment on specified terms, with the costs then accrued. If, 4 within 14 days after being served, the opposing party serves written notice accepting the offer, either party may then file the 5 offer and notice of acceptance, plus proof of service. The clerk 6 must then enter judgment. 7 Accordingly, a plaintiff who accepts an offer of judgment is entitled to “costs then 8 accrued.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 68; Holland v. Roeser, 37 F.3d 501, 503 (9th Cir. 1994). When 9 the term “costs” is used in an offer of judgment, it is read to include all costs awardable 10 under the relevant substantive statute, in this case California Civil Code § 1794(d). Marek 11 v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985); Fisher v. Kelly, 105 F.3d 350 (7th Cir. 1997). In other words, 12 a plaintiff who accepts a Rule 68 offer is entitled to attorneys’ fees accrued at the time of 13 the offer so long as the underlying statute provides for costs. Holland, 37 F.3d at 503 (citing 14 Marek, 473 U.S. at 9). 15 On January 26, 2026, the parties filed a stipulation as to Plaintiff’s fees, costs, and 16 expenses. (Doc. No. 16.) Therein, the parties stipulate to Defendant paying $17,000.00 to 17 resolve Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, to be satisfied by March 16, 2026. 18 (Id.) After satisfaction of payment, Plaintiff will dismiss this case with prejudice within 19 ten business days against all parties. (Id.) 20 In Defendant’s offer of judgment, Defendant states it will “pay Plaintiff’s costs, 21 expenses and attorney fees allowable under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 54(d) 22 and Civil Code sec. 1794(d). Attorney fees authorized by Civil Code section 1794(d) are 23 to be determined by the Court by way of a noticed motion.” (Doc. No. 13, Ex. 1 ¶ 2.) The 24 offer of judgment further provides that “Plaintiff may recover for fees and costs reasonably 25 and actually incurred in bringing said noticed motion.” (Id.) 26 Rather than filing a noticed motion, the parties filed the instant joint stipulation. 27 (Doc. No. 16.) The Court finds the parties have demonstrated good cause by stipulating to 28 Plaintiff’s award of attorneys’ fees and costs. See Meza v. FCA US, LLC, No. 1:22-CV- 1 }}00828-ADA-EPG, 2023 WL 4305110 (E.D. Cal. June 30, 2023) (finding a joint stipulation 2 || good cause for entry of attorneys’ fees under Civil Code Section 1794(d)). Thus, the Court 3 || GRANTS the parties’ stipulation and directs Defendant to pay $17,000.00 to Plaintiff by 4 || March 16, 2026. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: January 27, 2026 □

8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

ELISEO CARANTO ARCEO v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eliseo-caranto-arceo-v-jaguar-land-rover-north-america-llc-and-does-1-casd-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack