Elisabeth Glazner v. James Glazner

Eleventh Circuit

Elisabeth Glazner v. James Glazner

321 F.3d 1336, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3164, 2003 WL 360096

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 20, 2003

Docket02-11799

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 321 F.3d 1336 (Elisabeth Glazner v. James Glazner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elisabeth Glazner v. James Glazner, 321 F.3d 1336, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3164, 2003 WL 360096 (11th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI