Elijah White Ratcliff v. State
Opinion
Elijah W. Ratcliff appealed his conviction for insurance fraud and requested a free record. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. The trial court denied the request for indigent status after the appellant refused to testify in support of his request. On February 9, 2006, we affirmed the trial court's ruling and notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless the record was filed by March 13, 2006. Neither the clerk's record nor the reporter's record of the case below has been filed. The appellant is not indigent and is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk's record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
____________________________
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion Delivered April 5, 2006
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney, and Kreger, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elijah White Ratcliff v. State (Elijah White Ratcliff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.