Elijah Arvie v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana

• Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
• Decided: February 7, 2007
• Docket: CA-0006-1266
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

06-1266

ELIJAH ARVIE

VERSUS

SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY OF LOUISIANA

**********

APPEAL FROM THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF AVOYELLES, NO. 2003-4828-A HONORABLE MARK A. JEANSONNE, DISTRICT JUDGE

OSWALD A. DECUIR JUDGE

Court composed of Oswald A. Decuir, Glenn B. Gremillion, and Billy Howard Ezell, Judges.

AFFIRMED.

Gregory J. Laborde Laborde & Laborde P. O. Box 52564 Lafayette, LA 70505-2564 (337) 232-9928 Counsel for Defendant/Appellant: Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana

Anthony F. Salario Salario Law Firm P.O. Box 503 Marksville, LA 71351 (318) 240-7123 Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee: Elijah Arvie DECUIR, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a case alleging an insurer’s

bad-faith failure to settle a claim, thereby exposing its insured to a judgment in excess

of the insurance policy liability limit. Judgment was entered in favor of appellee,

Elijah Arvie, and against appellant, Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana

(“Safeway”), with damages awarded in the amount of the excess judgment plus

$2,000.00 in penalties. Safeway lodged this appeal. For the following reasons, we

affirm the judgment.

FACTS

Arvie’s vehicle was involved in an accident while being driven by Timothy

Garrett, a permissive user. Garrett leaned down to retrieve an ashtray while executing

a turn and subsequently rear-ended a parked vehicle. As a result of the accident,

Colby Heath, a guest passenger sustained injuries.

Heath’s counsel requested notice of policy limits from Arvie’s insurer,

Safeway. Subsequently, counsel offered to settle for the $10,000.00 policy limits

enclosing proof of medicals of nearly $4,000.00 and emergency room records

reflecting a diagnosis of a facial laceration, spasms, and concussion. Safeway,

declined the offer and countered with an offer of $1,250.00 plus medicals. Counsel

for Heath responded that the offer was ridiculous, and cited supporting case law

suggesting the obvious value of the claim. Safeway declined to increase its offer and

suit was filed which resulted in a judgment in the amount of $15,315.49. Heath

sought the $5,315.49 excess judgment against Arvie. Arvie filed this suit against

Safeway for bad faith failure to settle the claim seeking the amount of the excess

judgment plus penalties. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Arvie. Safeway

lodged this appeal. DISCUSSION

Safeway contends on appeal that the trial court erred in finding it arbitrary and

capricious in its handling of this claim and in awarding attorney fees pursuant to

La.R.S. 22:1220. We disagree.

Louisiana Revised Statute 22:1220 provides that an insurer “owes to his

insured a duty of good faith and fair dealing.” It further provides that “[t]he insurer

has an affirmative duty to adjust claims fairly and promptly and to make a reasonable

effort to settle claims with the insured or the claimant, or both.” See McGee v. Omni

Ins. Co., 02-1012 ( La.App. 3 Cir. 3/5/03), 840 So.2d 1248, writs denied, 03-1375,

03-1382 (La. 12/12/03), 860 So.2d 1449. The supreme court has held that only those

acts enumerated in La.R.S. 22:1220 (B) constitute a breach of these duties. Theriot

v. Midland Risk Ins. Co., 95-2895 (La. 5/20/97), 694 So.2d 184.

Louisiana Revised Statute 22:1220(B)(1) provides that, “[m]isrepresenting

pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to any coverages at issue”

constitutes a breach. “Misrepresentation can occur when an insurer either makes

untrue statements to an insured concerning pertinent facts or fails to divulge pertinent

facts to the insured.” McGee, 840 So.2d at 1256.

An insurer’s excess judgment liability is inherently a question of fact. Smith

v. Audubon Ins. Co., 95-2057 (La. 9/5/96), 679 So.2d 372. A court of appeal may not

set aside a trial court’s finding of fact in the absence of manifest error. Rosell v.

ESCO, 549 So.2d 840, 844 (La.1989).

The trial court found that Safeway consistently failed to communicate the status

of the claim to Arvie on a regular basis and, when it did, failed to communicate the

pertinent facts necessary for Arvie to consider in determining what was in his

personal interest. Particularly, Safeway failed to inform Arvie of the extent of

2 medical damages and the probability that damages would exceed the policy limits.

Moreover, Safeway failed to offer Arvie input into the settlement decision or to

disclose that it declined to even negotiate a reasonable settlement offer until after

Heath’s offer had expired. After careful review, we find no manifest error in the trial

court’s judgment.

DECREE

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs

of these proceedings are taxed to appellant, Safeway Insurance Company of

Louisiana.