ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc.
This text of ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc. (ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1038 Lower Tribunal No. 17-20857 ________________
Eliezer Taveras, Appellant,
vs.
U.S. Bank, N.A., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge.
Eliezer Taveras, in proper person.
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, and W. Bard Brockman and Ezequiel J. Romero, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Rivas v. Bank of New York Mellon, 244 So. 3d 334, 335
(Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (“The appellant may not attack the underlying
foreclosure judgment through appeal of an order granting possession of the
property after sale.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eliezer-taveras-v-us-bank-na-etc-fladistctapp-2022.