ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2022·No. 21-1038·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1038 Lower Tribunal No. 17-20857 ________________

Eliezer Taveras, Appellant,

vs.

U.S. Bank, N.A., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge.

Eliezer Taveras, in proper person.

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, and W. Bard Brockman and Ezequiel J. Romero, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Rivas v. Bank of New York Mellon, 244 So. 3d 334, 335

(Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (“The appellant may not attack the underlying

foreclosure judgment through appeal of an order granting possession of the

property after sale.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc. (ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivas v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon
244 So. 3d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)