Elie Linwood Williams v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Elie Linwood Williams v. United States

259 F.2d 836

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 13, 1958

Docket7697

StatusPublished

This text of 259 F.2d 836 (Elie Linwood Williams v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elie Linwood Williams v. United States, 259 F.2d 836 (4th Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Convicted under two counts of violating the Internal Revenue Act, 26 U.S. C.A. § 5632, by possessing and concealing whiskey upon which the required federal tax had not been paid, the appellant here raises the sole contention that the trial judge should not have refused his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, and should not have submitted the case to the jury.

There was substantial evidence from which a jury would fairly find guilt. A Government agent testified that he first saw Williams and two other men standing by a parked car in front of Williams’ store; that the three walked to the rear of his store where they stayed for a minute or so, and that they then walked back to the car together. On this walk McKinley Jones, one of the men, was carrying an open box in his arms. Jones put the box on the ground, opened the trunk of the car and deposited the box therein. All of this was done in Williams’ presence. The two others then entered the automobile and drove away.

The agent followed the car and, when he stopped it some distance away, he found in the trunk the cardboard box which he had seen carried from Williams’ store, and in that box was a five-gallon jar of “moonshine” whiskey. Returning to the store, the officer observed two similar empty five-gallon jugs being placed by Williams in another car. The officer later found two such jugs between Williams’ store and his house behind the store.

We perceive no error in the submission of this evidence to the jury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Convicted under two counts of violating the Internal Revenue Act, 26 U.S. C.A. § 5632, by possessing and concealing whiskey upon which the required federal tax had not been paid, the appellant here raises the sole contention that the trial judge should not have refused his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, and should not have submitted the case to the jury.

There was substantial evidence from which a jury would fairly find guilt. A Government agent testified that he first saw Williams and two other men standing by a parked car in front of Williams’ store; that the three walked to the rear of his store where they stayed for a minute or so, and that they then walked back to the car together. On this walk McKinley Jones, one of the men, was carrying an open box in his arms. Jones put the box on the ground, opened the trunk of the car and deposited the box therein. All of this was done in Williams’ presence. The two others then entered the automobile and drove away.

The agent followed the car and, when he stopped it some distance away, he found in the trunk the cardboard box which he had seen carried from Williams’ store, and in that box was a five-gallon jar of “moonshine” whiskey. Returning to the store, the officer observed two similar empty five-gallon jugs being placed by Williams in another car. The officer later found two such jugs between Williams’ store and his house behind the store.

We perceive no error in the submission of this evidence to the jury.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 F.2d 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elie-linwood-williams-v-united-states-ca4-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack