Elic Milton Lyman Senior v. State
Opinion
Motion Granted; Order filed February 11, 2020
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-19-00352-CR
ELIC MILTON LYMAN, SR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 83696-CR
ORDER
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has filed a motion to delay filing his pro se response until after he has had the opportunity to review the record. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 239th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before February 21, 2020; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elic Milton Lyman Senior v. State (Elic Milton Lyman Senior v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.