Eliazar Mendoza Rincon, Jr. v. Elizabeth Rincon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Eliazar Mendoza Rincon, Jr. v. Elizabeth Rincon

DecidedApril 19, 2001

Docket13-00-00585-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Eliazar Mendoza Rincon, Jr. v. Elizabeth Rincon (Eliazar Mendoza Rincon, Jr. v. Elizabeth Rincon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eliazar Mendoza Rincon, Jr. v. Elizabeth Rincon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-585-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

ELIAZAR MENDOZA RINCON, JR.

, Appellant,

v.

ELIZABETH RINCON

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ELIAZAR MENDOZA RINCON, JR., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 98-3836-C. The clerk's record was filed on September 22, 2000. The reporter's record was filed on February 12, 2001. Appellant's brief was due on March 14, 2001. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On March 21, 2001, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 19^th day of April, 2001

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-00-585-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

ELIAZAR MENDOZA RINCON, JR.

, Appellant,

v.

ELIZABETH RINCON

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ELIAZAR MENDOZA RINCON, JR., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 98-3836-C. The clerk's record was filed on September 22, 2000. The reporter's record was filed on February 12, 2001. Appellant's brief was due on March 14, 2001. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On March 21, 2001, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 19^th day of April, 2001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Eliazar Mendoza Rincon, Jr. v. Elizabeth Rincon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eliazar-mendoza-rincon-jr-v-elizabeth-rincon-texapp-2001.