Elias v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Elias v. State

144 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 623

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 15, 1932

Docket4 Div. 884.

StatusPublished

This text of 144 So. 921 (Elias v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elias v. State, 144 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 623 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment in this case charged this appellant with the offense of assault with intent to murder; the.charge being that he unlawfully and with malice aforethought did assault Bertha Lee Thomas with the intent to murder her, etc.

Upon the trial the jury returned a verdict of, “We the jury find the defendant guilty of an assault with the intent to murder,”' whereupon the court, in line with said verdict, duly sentenced appellant to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than 2y2 years, nor more than 3 years. From said judgment, this appeal was taken.

We find upon investigation that the proceedings in the lower court were regular throughout, and,' as no error is apparent on the record upon which this appeal is predicated, the judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment in this case charged this appellant with the offense of assault with intent to murder; the.charge being that he unlawfully and with malice aforethought did assault Bertha Lee Thomas with the intent to murder her, etc.

Upon the trial the jury returned a verdict of, “We the jury find the defendant guilty of an assault with the intent to murder,”' whereupon the court, in line with said verdict, duly sentenced appellant to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than 2y2 years, nor more than 3 years. From said judgment, this appeal was taken.

We find upon investigation that the proceedings in the lower court were regular throughout, and,' as no error is apparent on the record upon which this appeal is predicated, the judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elias-v-state-alactapp-1932.