Elias Ramirez v. State
This text of Elias Ramirez v. State (Elias Ramirez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 24, 2020
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00806-CR
ELIAS RAMIREZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F19-51891-T
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans On May 7, 2019, after Elias Ramirez pleaded guilty to possession of less than
one gram of heroin, the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt, placing him on
deferred adjudication community supervision for six months. The trial court later
extended appellant’s community supervision until May 5, 2021. In July 2020, the
State filed a motion to proceed with adjudication of guilt, alleging appellant violated
various conditions of probation. Following a August 31, 2020 hearing, the trial court
denied the State’s motion, modified the terms of appellant’s community supervision, and continued him on deferred adjudication probation until May 5, 2024.
Appellant’s notice of appeal from that decision was filed on September 2, 2020.
As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal
defendants only after conviction. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—
Dallas 1998, no pet.). With regard to deferred adjudication, the Texas Legislature
has authorized appeal of only two types of orders: (1) an order granting deferred
adjudication, and (2) an order imposing punishment accompanying an adjudication
of guilt. Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Orders
modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication are not in themselves
appealable. Id.
Here, there is no judgment of conviction; rather, the trial court continued
appellant on deferred adjudication. Under these circumstances, we do not have
jurisdiction. See id.
We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
/David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 200806F.U05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ELIAS RAMIREZ, Appellant On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-20-00806-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F19-51891-T. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Nowell participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered September 24, 2020.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elias Ramirez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elias-ramirez-v-state-texapp-2020.