Eli v. Carter Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Eli v. Carter Oil Co.

1932 OK 754, 23 P.2d 1011, 164 Okla. 302, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 535

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 22, 1932

Docket19818

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1932 OK 754 (Eli v. Carter Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eli v. Carter Oil Co., 1932 OK 754, 23 P.2d 1011, 164 Okla. 302, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 535 (Okla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

KORNEGAY, J.

In this case the matters involved are several cross-appeals from an order in accounting. A separate appeal was prosecuted in case No. 20110, by the Carter Oil Company, the Tidal Oil Company, J. Wood Glass, and F. A. Calvert. An opinion in that case has been rendered, which is decisive of this ease.

The decision appealed from of the No> *303 wata county district court on the accounting in this case, rendered on September 14, 1928, is in all things reversed, and the decision of this court rendered on April 19, 1927, is set aside, and the opinion filed at that time and reported in 126 Okla. 12, 257 P. 761, is withdrawn and overruled, and 'it is ordered that the original case reversed therein from the Nowata county district court be now affirmed, the same being case No. 5204 in said court.

HEFNER, SWINDALL, and McNEILL, JX, and HENSHAW, Special J., concur. LESTER, C. X, CLARK, V. C. J., and YOUNG, Special J., dissent. RILEY, X, not participating. CULLISON and ANDREWS, JT., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KORNEGAY, J.

In this case the matters involved are several cross-appeals from an order in accounting. A separate appeal was prosecuted in case No. 20110, by the Carter Oil Company, the Tidal Oil Company, J. Wood Glass, and F. A. Calvert. An opinion in that case has been rendered, which is decisive of this ease.

The decision appealed from of the No> *303 wata county district court on the accounting in this case, rendered on September 14, 1928, is in all things reversed, and the decision of this court rendered on April 19, 1927, is set aside, and the opinion filed at that time and reported in 126 Okla. 12, 257 P. 761, is withdrawn and overruled, and 'it is ordered that the original case reversed therein from the Nowata county district court be now affirmed, the same being case No. 5204 in said court.

HEFNER, SWINDALL, and McNEILL, JX, and HENSHAW, Special J., concur. LESTER, C. X, CLARK, V. C. J., and YOUNG, Special J., dissent. RILEY, X, not participating. CULLISON and ANDREWS, JT., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1932 OK 754, 23 P.2d 1011, 164 Okla. 302, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eli-v-carter-oil-co-okla-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack