Elford Guy Coker v. Robert W. Donlin, Acting Warden, Attorney General of South Carolina

875 F.2d 314, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6567, 1989 WL 50486
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 12, 1989
Docket89-7537
StatusUnpublished

This text of 875 F.2d 314 (Elford Guy Coker v. Robert W. Donlin, Acting Warden, Attorney General of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elford Guy Coker v. Robert W. Donlin, Acting Warden, Attorney General of South Carolina, 875 F.2d 314, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6567, 1989 WL 50486 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

875 F.2d 314
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Elford Guy COKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Robert W. DONLIN, Acting Warden, Attorney General of South
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7537.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 1989.
Decided May 12, 1989.

Elford Guy Coker, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Elford Guy Coker seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Coker v. Donlin, C/A No. 88-1769 (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleek (Lena Albert) v. O'DOnnell (Gerald M.)
875 F.2d 314 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
875 F.2d 314, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6567, 1989 WL 50486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elford-guy-coker-v-robert-w-donlin-acting-warden-attorney-general-of-ca4-1989.