Eley v. Brooklyn Cumberland Medical Center
This text of 55 A.D.2d 925 (Eley v. Brooklyn Cumberland Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., predicated upon negligent care and failure to obtain informed consent, the defendant surgeon appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 19, 1976, upon a jury verdict, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against him on the second cause of action, which alleged a failure to obtain informed consent. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. In our opinion, sufficient evidence was adduced at the trial to justify a determination by the jury that the defendant surgeon, before performing open heart surgery upon the infant plaintiff, failed to advise the parents about the dangers of postoperative embolism and brain, heart, or lung damage, and that, had they been informed of such risks, they would not have consented to the operation. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Titone and Mollen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 A.D.2d 925, 390 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eley-v-brooklyn-cumberland-medical-center-nyappdiv-1977.