Eley v. Brooklyn Cumberland Medical Center

55 A.D.2d 925, 390 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10176
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 1977·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., predicated upon negligent care and failure to obtain informed consent, the defendant surgeon appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 19, 1976, upon a jury verdict, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against him on the second cause of action, which alleged a failure to obtain informed consent. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. In our opinion, sufficient evidence was adduced at the trial to justify a determination by the jury that the defendant surgeon, before performing open heart surgery upon the infant plaintiff, failed to advise the parents about the dangers of postoperative embolism and brain, heart, or lung damage, and that, had they been informed of such risks, they would not have consented to the operation. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Titone and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eley v. Brooklyn Cumberland Medical Center, 55 A.D.2d 925, 390 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

55 A.D.2d 925 (Eley v. Brooklyn Cumberland Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shinn v. St. James Mercy Hospital
675 F. Supp. 94 (W.D. New York, 1987)
Etkin v. Marcus
74 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)