Eley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

80 S.E. 1064, 165 N.C. 78, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 221
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 4, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 1064 (Eley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 80 S.E. 1064, 165 N.C. 78, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 221 (N.C. 1914).

Opinion

AlleN, J.

A jury trial being waived, the findings of fact by the judge are as conclusive as, the verdict of a jury, when there is evidence to support them (Matthews v. Fry, 143 N. C., 385); and in this case it cannot be said there was no evidence to support the findings, because the burden of proof was on the plaintiff to establish negligence, and his Honor had the right which a jury could have exercised, to say that the evidence of the plaintiff did not satisfy him that the defendant was negligent.

There was only one fact in controversy, negligence, and upon a finding upon this adverse to the plaintiff, only one conclusion of law could follow, that the plaintiff take nothing by his action; and an inspection of the record discloses that the decision of the judge was “given in writing,” and that the finding of fact and the conclusion of law are stated separately.

*80 This is, in our opinion, a full compliance witb Revisal, sec. 541.

Tbe fact upon wbicb tbe right to recover depends 'has been found against the plaintiff by the- tribunal of' his own selection, and there i§ no error,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY v. Shook
193 S.E.2d 392 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Woodard v. Mordecai
67 S.E.2d 639 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Mitchell v. Barfield
59 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Town of Burnsville v. Boone
58 S.E.2d 351 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Cannon v. . Blair
50 S.E.2d 732 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Poole v. . Gentry
49 S.E.2d 464 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Fish v. . Hanson
25 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Dailey v. Washington National Insurance
182 S.E. 332 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Cooke
169 S.E. 148 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Walker v. . Walker
167 S.E. 818 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Roebuck v. National Surety Co.
156 S.E. 531 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Chandler v. . Conabeer
153 S.E. 313 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Colvard v. . Dicus
151 S.E. 191 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.E. 1064, 165 N.C. 78, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eley-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-nc-1914.