Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather

City of New York Municipal Court

Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather

21 Misc. 539, 47 N.Y.S. 718

DecidedOctober 15, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Misc. 539 (Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather, 21 Misc. 539, 47 N.Y.S. 718 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An order was obtained against the judgment debtor herein in supplementary proceedings for his examination. At the time it was granted he was seized and in possession of certain real estate in this city. Upon motion, said order was vacated at Special Term because the judgment debtor; when the judgment was rendered, and the execution thereon was returned unsatisfied, and said order in' supplementary proceedings was issued; was the owner and seized in fee of real estate.

[540]*540We think that the order appealed from must be affirmed. Globe Elec. Co. v. Sternfeld, N. Y. Law Journal, Jan. 7, 1897; Moyer v. Moyer, 7 App. Div. 528; Importers & Traders’ Nat. Bank v. Quackenbush, 143 N. Y. 567.

The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI