Elevation Health LLC v. BQC Global Supply Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedDecember 7, 2022
Docket1:22-cv-10308
StatusUnknown

This text of Elevation Health LLC v. BQC Global Supply Inc. (Elevation Health LLC v. BQC Global Supply Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elevation Health LLC v. BQC Global Supply Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- X : ELEVATION HEALTH, LLC, : : 22 Civ. 10308 (PAE) Plaintiff, : : ORDER -v- : : BQC GLOBAL SUPPLY INC, d/b/a BQ SUPPLIES, JING : JING HE, BRANDOM WONG, ALYSSA REYES, and : JACOB BURBAS, : : Defendants. X

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On December 7, 2022, plaintiff filed the complaint in this case, asserting diversity of citizenship of the parties as the sole basis for federal jurisdiction. Dkt. 1. On review, it appears to the Court that plaintiff is a limited liability company (“LLC”). The citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its constituent members. While the complaint alleges that plaintiff is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, Illinois, the complaint does not also allege the citizenship of the LLC’s members. To enable the Court to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship, plaintiff must therefore file an amended complaint, which must allege (1) the citizenship of natural persons who are members of the LLC and (2) the place of incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate entities who are members of the LLC. See Handelsman v. Bedford Village Assoc. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51–52 (2d Cir. 2000) (citing Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998)); Strother v. Harte, 171 F. Supp. 2d 203, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (“For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”). If plaintiff is unable to amend the complaint to allege truthfully complete diversity based upon the citizenship of each constituent person or entity of the LLC, then the complaint will be dismissed, without prejudice, for want of subject matter jurisdiction. See Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts Assocs., 915 F.2d 81, 83 (2d Cir. 1990) (“[S]ubject matter

jurisdiction is an unwaivable sine qua non for the exercise of federal judicial power.”). To enable the Court to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship, plaintiff must therefore file an amended complaint. Accordingly, in the interests of justice, the Court grants plaintiff leave to amend the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) to allege the citizenships of all members of the LLCs in this case by December 17, 2022. SO ORDERED.

____________________________ Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge

Dated: December 7, 2022 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Elevation Health LLC v. BQC Global Supply Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elevation-health-llc-v-bqc-global-supply-inc-nysd-2022.