Elenberg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 251 A.D. 443 (Elenberg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While the evidence disclosed that the plaintiff, a real estate operator, was suffering from a disease of the heart which limited his activities to some extent, he failed to establish by a fair preponderance of evidence that such disease totally disabled him within the definition contained in either policy.
The judgments should be reversed, with costs, and the complaints dismissed, with costs.
Present •— Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Judgments unanimously reversed, with costs, and complaints dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 443, 297 N.Y.S. 343, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elenberg-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1937.