Elenberg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

251 A.D. 443, 297 N.Y.S. 343, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6966
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 251 A.D. 443 (Elenberg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elenberg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 251 A.D. 443, 297 N.Y.S. 343, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While the evidence disclosed that the plaintiff, a real estate operator, was suffering from a disease of the heart which limited his activities to some extent, he failed to establish by a fair preponderance of evidence that such disease totally disabled him within the definition contained in either policy.

The judgments should be reversed, with costs, and the complaints dismissed, with costs.

Present •— Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgments unanimously reversed, with costs, and complaints dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwenk v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
257 A.D. 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Shabotzky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
257 A.D. 257 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 443, 297 N.Y.S. 343, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elenberg-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1937.