Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of American Seating Company

Fifth Circuit

Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of American Seating Company

358 F.2d 737, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6547

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1966

Docket22545_1

StatusPublished

This text of 358 F.2d 737 (Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of American Seating Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of American Seating Company, 358 F.2d 737, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6547 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this Miller Act suit by the supplier of auditorium seats permanently affixed to the floors of the auditorium in the Central Laboratory and Office Building on the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to warrant the drawing of inferences by the trial court, sitting without a jury, that the furnishing of the seats was pursuant to the terms of the bonded contract entered into by the appellant “to perform all work required for the construction of the Central Laboratory and Office Building, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama.”

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this Miller Act suit by the supplier of auditorium seats permanently affixed to the floors of the auditorium in the Central Laboratory and Office Building on the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to warrant the drawing of inferences by the trial court, sitting without a jury, that the furnishing of the seats was pursuant to the terms of the bonded contract entered into by the appellant “to perform all work required for the construction of the Central Laboratory and Office Building, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama.”

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 F.2d 737, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/electronic-missile-facilities-inc-and-continental-casualty-company-v-ca5-1966.