Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice
This text of Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice (Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 07-0656 (JDB) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Defendant.
ORDER
Before the Court is [40] the Department of Justice's motion for summary judgment. The
Electronic Frontier Foundation has indicated that it does not oppose that motion, with one
exception. See Pl.'s Mem. in Supp. of Cross-Motion for Summ. J. ("Pl.'s Mem.") [Docket Entry
43], at 1. That exception is the Department's "continued withholding of Intelligence Oversight
Board Case Numbers" under exemption two of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §
552(b)(2). Id. The Foundation cross-moves for partial summary judgment on that issue. But the
Department is not withholding Intelligence Oversight Board Case Numbers under exemption
two. Indeed, in its own motion for summary judgment, the Department asserted that it was no
longer withholding the Case Numbers at all, and would be releasing that information to the
Foundation. See Def.'s Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J. [Docket Entry 40], at 17 n.12.1 And
1 In its cross-motion for summary judgment, the Foundation indicated that it believed the Department of Justice's decision to release the Intelligence Oversight Board Case Numbers extended to all documents, not only those "contained in the representative sample of documents designated by the parties." Pl.'s Mem. at 4. The Department concurred in this assessment. See Def.'s Reply in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J. [Docket Entry 45], at 2; see also Bonner v. Dep't of State, 928 F.2d 1148, 1152 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (documents in a representative sample "count not the Department has now done so. See Def.'s Status Report [Docket Entry 49], at 1 ("DOJ hereby
reports that it has completed this review and released to plaintiff Electronic Frontier Foundation .
. . [Intelligence Oversight Board] Case Numbers . . . ."). Because the Department voluntarily
agreed to release the Case Numbers before the Foundation filed its cross-motion for partial
summary judgment requesting the same action, there is no basis on which the grant the
Foundation's cross-motion. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Department of Justice's motion for summary judgment is
GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that the Electronic Frontier Foundation's cross-motion for partial summary
judgment is DENIED as moot; and it is further
ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John D. Bates JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge
Dated: May 25, 2010
simply for themselves, but for presumably similar non-sample documents still withheld").
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/electronic-frontier-foundation-v-department-of-jus-dcd-2010.