Electrolux Corporation v. Dustpak, Ltd., Inc., and Anschel Wolf

330 F.2d 958, 141 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 427, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5459
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 5, 1964·No. 28362_1·Published

Opinion

330 F.2d 958

ELECTROLUX CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
DUSTPAK, LTD., INC., and Anschel Wolf, Appellees.

No. 421.

Docket 28362.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 4, 1964.

Decided May 5, 1964.

Plaintiff-appellant in an action for patent infringement appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, John F. Dooling, Jr., J., dismissing the action, after a hearing, on the ground that the patents are invalid.

John T. Kelton, New York City (Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart; Elmer R. Helferich; Thomas C. Betts), New York City, for appellant.

Samuel J. Stoll, Jamaica, N. Y., for appellees.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court dismissing plaintiff's action alleging patent infringement is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Dooling which is reported at 215 F.Supp. 367 (E.D.N.Y.1963).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electrolux Corporation v. Dustpak, Ltd., Inc., and Anschel Wolf, 330 F.2d 958, 141 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 427, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5459 (2d Cir. 1964).

330 F.2d 958 (Electrolux Corporation v. Dustpak, Ltd., Inc., and Anschel Wolf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Electrolux Corp. v. Dustpak Ltd.
215 F. Supp. 367 (E.D. New York, 1963)