Electrolux Corp. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 487
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Electrolux Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 37
United States Customs Court·Decided June 21, 1956·No. No. 60063; protest 282852-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of finished necessary parts, composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, of electric floor polishers; that said polishers are articles which have as an essential feature an electrical element or device; and that the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in United States v. J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. (42 C. C. P. A. 141, C. A. D. 586), except that the merchandise therein consisted of parts of electric ironers, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electrolux Corp. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 487 (cusc 1956).

36 Cust. Ct. 487 (Electrolux Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.