Electrolux Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Electrolux Corp. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 174, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 529

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 30, 1948

DocketNo. 52444; protest 132231-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Cust. Ct. 174 (Electrolux Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Electrolux Corp. v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 174, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 529 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the testimony produced at the trial, together with an examination of the official papers in evidence, it was apparent that the disputed items were never received and apparently were not shipped. The plaintiff having sustained its burden of proof on the issue of nonimportation, the protest was sustained as to the items in question. (United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351, and United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board, id. 118, C. A. D. 352, followed.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the testimony produced at the trial, together with an examination of the official papers in evidence, it was apparent that the disputed items were never received and apparently were not shipped. The plaintiff having sustained its burden of proof on the issue of nonimportation, the protest was sustained as to the items in question. (United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351, and United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board, id. 118, C. A. D. 352, followed.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Cust. Ct. 174, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/electrolux-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1948.