Electrical Switchgear Union v. I-T-E Circuit Breaker Co.
This text of 208 A.2d 473 (Electrical Switchgear Union v. I-T-E Circuit Breaker Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the lower court entered under the Act of April 25, 1927, P. L. 381, §3, 5 P.S. §163, directing the parties to proceed to arbitration of a contract dispute. The appeal must be dismissed because it was perfected too late.
Section 15 of the above cited Act (5 P.S. §175) provides that “[a]n appeal may be taken to the Supreme or Superior Court, as in cases of final judgments, from an order . . . directing . . . the parties to proceed to arbitration. Such appeal must be taken and perfected within thirty days from the date when the order is made . . . .” (Emphasis supplied). The record shows that an appealable order was entered on July 8, 1964, [51]*51but the appeal before us1 was not perfected until August 10, 1964, beyond the 30 day limit provided by statute. The purpose of the Arbitration Act, in general, and the statutory appealability of this type of order, in particular, make timeliness imperative.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 A.2d 473, 417 Pa. 49, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/electrical-switchgear-union-v-i-t-e-circuit-breaker-co-pa-1965.