Electrical Machinery Co. v. Royal Globe Insurance Companies

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Electrical Machinery Co. v. Royal Globe Insurance Companies

206 S.E.2d 557, 131 Ga. App. 618, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1494

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 18, 1974

Docket49148

StatusPublished

This text of 206 S.E.2d 557 (Electrical Machinery Co. v. Royal Globe Insurance Companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Electrical Machinery Co. v. Royal Globe Insurance Companies, 206 S.E.2d 557, 131 Ga. App. 618, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1494 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Stolz, Judge.

The plaintiff, Electrical Machinery Co., an alleged insured of the defendant, Royal Globe, brought a declaratory judgment action against the plaintiff in a pending tort action, to determine the obligations of the defendant insurer in respect to settling, defending, or paying any final judgment in the pending tort action, and to enjoin the prosecution of the pending tort action until the present action is terminated. The plaintiff appeals from the grant of the defendant insurer’s motion for summary judgment. Held:

This appeal is controlled adversely to the plaintiff by Hoffman v. Ins. Co. of N. A., 130 Ga. App. 777 (204 SE2d 520), and cits.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen and Webb, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stolz, Judge.

The plaintiff, Electrical Machinery Co., an alleged insured of the defendant, Royal Globe, brought a declaratory judgment action against the plaintiff in a pending tort action, to determine the obligations of the defendant insurer in respect to settling, defending, or paying any final judgment in the pending tort action, and to enjoin the prosecution of the pending tort action until the present action is terminated. The plaintiff appeals from the grant of the defendant insurer’s motion for summary judgment. Held:

This appeal is controlled adversely to the plaintiff by Hoffman v. Ins. Co. of N. A., 130 Ga. App. 777 (204 SE2d 520), and cits.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen and Webb, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 S.E.2d 557, 131 Ga. App. 618, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/electrical-machinery-co-v-royal-globe-insurance-companies-gactapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack