Ele, Inc. v. Big River Telephone Co., LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ele, Inc. v. Big River Telephone Co., LLC

241 S.W.3d 423, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1737, 2007 WL 4394449

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2007

DocketED 89572

StatusPublished

This text of 241 S.W.3d 423 (Ele, Inc. v. Big River Telephone Co., LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ele, Inc. v. Big River Telephone Co., LLC, 241 S.W.3d 423, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1737, 2007 WL 4394449 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Big River Telephone Co. (Big River) appeals from the judgment awarding damages to ELE, Inc., and the Estate of Edward Eagleton (collectively ELE) in the amount of $2,581,718.70 for principal and interest owed under the Amended and Senior Promissory Note (Amended Promissory Note), pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the parties’ Purchase Agreement (Fourth Amendment). Big *424 River argues the trial court erred in (1) awarding damages to ELE under the Fourth Amendment; (2) denying Big River damages under a benefit of the bargain theory; and (3) denying Big River attorneys’ fees. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Big River Telephone Co. (Big River) appeals from the judgment awarding damages to ELE, Inc., and the Estate of Edward Eagleton (collectively ELE) in the amount of $2,581,718.70 for principal and interest owed under the Amended and Senior Promissory Note (Amended Promissory Note), pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the parties’ Purchase Agreement (Fourth Amendment). Big *424 River argues the trial court erred in (1) awarding damages to ELE under the Fourth Amendment; (2) denying Big River damages under a benefit of the bargain theory; and (3) denying Big River attorneys’ fees. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 S.W.3d 423, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1737, 2007 WL 4394449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ele-inc-v-big-river-telephone-co-llc-moctapp-2007.