Eldridge v. Wright
15 Cal. 88
Opinion
Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.
Application for injunction. We deny the application. We see no necessity for this application, if we had the power to grant it, for the remedy of the plaintiff under the order reviving the injunction pending the appeal is ample to protect the plaintiff until the appeal can be heard, or the injunction be dissolved by some competent authority.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eldridge v. Wright, 15 Cal. 88 (Cal. 1860).
15 Cal. 88 (Eldridge v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
109 P. 620 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
Swift v. Shepard
1 P. 493 (California Supreme Court, 1883)
Central Railroad v. Standard Oil Co.
33 N.J. Eq. 372 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1881)